Our elections are so deeply flawed that we are a republic of fake news

First of three parts

WITH the elections consuming our country’s political life up to May, and with the past 2022 polls giving our country what would be the worst post-EDSA administration that would likely result in our nation’s ruin, it is a good enough time to analyze critically this phenomenon created by modern capitalism (the free worker equals free voter). It certainly would likely take at least a century before mankind can invent a better system than “democracy” and “capitalism” — but we have to start the debate.

I asked my online researcher (ChatGPT) to give me a summary of democracy’s flaws, which I post as follows. (I will discuss and provide the details for these flaws on Wednesday and Friday.)

Democracy is often regarded as humanity’s greatest political invention, promising equality, representation and justice for all. It is the ideal of governance: a system where the people themselves hold the reins of power, exercising their will through free elections and fair laws. Yet, for many, this ideal remains just that — an ideal. In practice, democracy is seen as a hollow shell, a system that has been hijacked by the very forces it was designed to guard against. To its critics, democracy is no more than a sham, a grand performance that conceals corruption, inequality and exploitation.

One of the most glaring flaws in many democracies is the dominance of political dynasties and entrenched elites. Instead of being a government by the people, democracy often becomes a government by the few, with power concentrated in the hands of a small number of families or clans. In countries like the Philippines, the names of political families dominate election ballots, and positions of power are passed from one generation to the next like heirlooms. The same is true in other parts of the world, where power remains the purview of a privileged class. This dynastic control undermines the very principle of equal opportunity that democracy is meant to uphold. Instead of offering fresh leadership and new ideas, elections become contests between competing factions of the elite, leaving the ordinary citizen with little real choice.

Money

The influence of money further corrupts the democratic process. In theory, elections are supposed to reflect the will of the people, but in practice, they often reflect the will of those who can afford to buy influence. Campaigns require vast sums of money for advertisements, rallies and grassroots operations, making it nearly impossible for candidates without deep pockets — or connections to wealthy donors — to compete. In some cases, this financial power translates directly into corruption, with votes being outrightly purchased or favors promised in exchange for support. The result is a political system that serves the interests of the wealthy and powerful while marginalizing the poor and disenfranchised.

Adding to the problem is the manipulation of public opinion, which has become increasingly sophisticated in the digital age. Populist leaders often exploit the fears and frustrations of the masses, using emotional appeals and simple slogans to gain support. These leaders present themselves as saviors, promising to solve complex problems with quick fixes, even as they erode democratic norms. Social media has amplified this phenomenon, providing a platform for misinformation and propaganda. Fake news spreads rapidly, polarizing societies and undermining trust in institutions. Instead of fostering informed debate, modern democracies are increasingly plagued by echo chambers and disinformation campaigns.

Even when elections are free and fair, democracy often falters in its execution. Once in office, elected leaders frequently prioritize their own interests — or those of their financial backers — over the needs of the public. Corruption becomes endemic, with public funds siphoned off for private gain. Accountability mechanisms, such as independent courts and watchdog institutions, are often weak or compromised, leaving citizens with few avenues for recourse. The result is a system where the powerful can act with impunity, secure in the knowledge that they are unlikely to face consequences.

Accountability

This lack of accountability contributes to a growing sense of disillusionment among voters. Many citizens feel that their votes do not matter, that the system is rigged against them. This disillusionment leads to voter apathy, with turnout rates declining in many democracies. When citizens disengage from the political process, it creates a vicious cycle: politicians become less accountable to the public, further eroding trust in democracy and alienating even more voters.

Another significant flaw in democratic systems is their inability to address deep-rooted social and economic inequalities. While democracy promises equality, the reality is that power and resources are often concentrated in the hands of a small elite. The wealthy and powerful have the means to influence policy through lobbying, campaign donations, and other forms of soft power. This influence ensures that laws and policies often favor the rich, exacerbating inequality and leaving marginalized communities even further behind. For many, democracy feels like an exclusive club, accessible only to those who can afford the price of admission.

Democracy’s failures are also evident on a global scale. In some cases, democracies are little more than puppet regimes, beholden to foreign powers or multinational corporations. This external influence undermines national sovereignty and distorts the democratic process. For instance, foreign governments or organizations may fund candidates who align with their interests, interfering in elections and shaping policies to their advantage. This external meddling further alienates citizens, who feel that their government is more accountable to foreign interests than to its own people.

Moreover, democracy is not immune to the “tyranny of the majority,” where the will of the majority overrides the rights of minorities. In such cases, democratic systems can become tools of oppression, enabling the majority to impose its values and policies on marginalized groups. This dynamic highlights a fundamental tension within democracy: the need to balance majority rule with the protection of minority rights. When this balance is not achieved, democracy can perpetuate inequality and injustice rather than addressing it.

Institutions

Weak institutions further erode the promise of democracy. In many countries, the institutions meant to uphold democratic principles — such as the judiciary, electoral commissions, and media — are vulnerable to manipulation. When these institutions are compromised, democracy becomes a mere facade, with the outward appearance of free elections and public debate masking a lack of genuine representation. This erosion of institutions is often gradual, making it difficult for citizens to recognize or resist until it is too late.

Despite these criticisms, defenders of democracy argue that it remains the best available system of governance. They point out that democracy’s flaws are not inherent to the system itself but rather the result of human failings — greed, corruption and the lust for power. Unlike authoritarian regimes, democracies have the capacity for self-correction. Citizens can vote out corrupt leaders, reform institutions, and push for greater transparency and accountability. However, for these corrective mechanisms to work, citizens must remain engaged and vigilant — a challenge in the face of widespread disillusionment.

For many, democracy’s greatest strength is also its greatest weakness: its reliance on the people. In theory, this reliance empowers citizens, giving them a voice in their own governance. In practice, it means that democracy is only as strong as the people who participate in it. When they are apathetic, misinformed, or disengaged, democracy falters.

In the end, the idea that democracy is a sham reflects a profound sense of betrayal. It is the gap between democracy’s promise and its reality that fuels this criticism — a promise of equality, justice and representation that too often goes unfulfilled. While democracy may be flawed, it remains a system worth fighting for, if only because it offers the possibility of change. To bridge the gap between promise and reality, citizens must demand better — from their leaders, their institutions, and themselves. Only then can democracy live up to its ideals and become the system it was always meant to be.

---

Facebook: Rigoberto Tiglao

Twitter: @bobitiglao

Archives: www.rigobertotiglao.com

Book orders: www.rigobertotiglao.com/shop

The post Our elections are so deeply flawed that we are a republic of fake news first appeared on Rigoberto Tiglao.

Our elections are so deeply flawed that we are a republic of fake news
Source: Breaking News PH